A Case Study on the Allegations of Genocide Within Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine Based on the International Court of Justice

Nagaria, Christopher David (2024) A Case Study on the Allegations of Genocide Within Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine Based on the International Court of Justice. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Tarumanagara.

	Text Front Page_Christopher David Nagaria_205200105.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text Content Chapter_Christopher David Nagaria_205200105.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (13MB)
	Text Bibliography_Christopher David Nagaria_205200105.pdf Download (724kB)
	Text Attachment_Christopher David Nagaria_205200105.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (1MB)

Abstract

Putin’s call for a “special military operation” resulted in a full scale invasion against Ukraine in 24 February 2024. The armed conflict preceded by tensions from various aspects which included the historical significance, political interference, geography, ethnicity and culture similarities between both countries. The tensions initially rose from the annexation of Ukraine’s region of Crimea and the claimed independencies of the People’s Republics of Luhansk (LPR) and Donetsk (DPR). The ongoing invasion in Ukraine has resulted in the death and destruction of Ukrainian nationals. The systematic tactics brought by Russian troops have been characterized as acts committed to genocide from the international community and local investigators within the conflict zone. The United Nations have called for peaceful resolutions which has yet been achieved. On 25 February 2024, Ukraine has filed an application to the International Court of Justice to accordingly adjudicate the situation based on the Genocide Convention. The implications which arises to this case is determining the legal standings of the court as well as determining whether Russia’s aggression may have committed genocide. The method of research applies a case study approach through doctrinal legal research in determining the legal facts and analysis from a specific event. The results have shown that the ICJ has juridical authority to adjudicate both parties under the ICJ Statute and Genocide Convention. Furthermore, there are strong evidence portrayed throughout the war which violates both the mental and physical element of committing genocide under Article 2 and 3 of the Genocide Convention.

Item Type:	Thesis (Skripsi)
Additional Information:	Supervisor: Prof.Dr.Ariawan Gunadi S.H., M.H.,
Uncontrolled Keywords:	Genocide; International Court of Justice; Ukraine v. Russia.
Subjects:	Skripsi/Tugas Akhir Skripsi/Tugas Akhir > Fakultas Hukum
Divisions:	Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum
Depositing User:	FH Perpus
Date Deposited:	04 Jul 2025 06:54
Last Modified:	04 Jul 2025 06:56
URI:	https://repotest.untar.ac.id/id/eprint/47633

Actions (login required)

View Item