PRIANTO, YUWONO and Sumantri, Viony Kresna and Sasmita, Paksi yudha Pros and Cons of AI Robot as a Legal Subject. Pros and Cons of AI Robot as a Legal Subject.
|
Text
buktipenelitian_10288001_3A220716.pdf Download (382kB) |
Abstract
The Facebook case of shutting down
Artificial Intelligence (AI), which was able to create its own
language, worried many people because it had far-reaching
consequences for human life, inspiring the establishment of a
non- profit company Open AI which aims to avoid misuse of
AI in the world. This article is based on normative legal
research that refers to secondary data. Data collection,
processing, and analysis are carried out qualitatively using the
Miles and Huberman models. The paradox that accompanies
the development of technology, especially robots with AI
capabilities needs to be taken seriously by the executive,
legislative, judicial and legal academics. With the ability to
learn and make decisions, AI robots can decide for themselves
various actions that will be taken out of their owner's control.
There is a
shift in the treatment of AI robots that are seen as
legal objects (goods), then equated with pets, treated as legal
subjects as well as humans and legal entities. While the
regulation on that, is not immediately sought, so the existence
of AI robots is in a grey area. The fact is that AI robots are
able to develop their own communication systems that are not
understood by their creators, as happened in the case of
Facebook. This requires all components to reorganize human
relations with God, fellow living beings and products of human
creation in a set of legal and social rules for the survival of
humanity itself.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Penelitian > Fakultas Hukum |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Ilmu Hukum |
| Depositing User: | Puskom untar untar |
| Date Deposited: | 17 Dec 2020 04:44 |
| Last Modified: | 17 Dec 2020 04:44 |
| URI: | https://repotest.untar.ac.id/id/eprint/13552 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |
